Photo: California Bicycle Coalition
Governor Jerry Brown's recently proposed 2015-16 budget summary [PDF] released on January 9 included a passing reference to $360 million previously allocated for the Active Transportation Program (ATP), but the budget summary offered no details about future funding, nor what allocations for the coming year might be.
The details were released late that afternoon, and they show that the state is not yet taking the commitment to walking and biking seriously. The ATP's allocation for 2015-16 under Brown's proposed budget is considerably less than the previous year's funding level.
This is the first step in the budget process. The governor proposes a budget, which then is discussed in the legislature--the first such hearing was held Friday in the Assembly. In the spring Brown will propose revisions, based on legislative feedback, which will then undergo further discussions and revision. The final budget must be passed by June.
The budget proposal reads like an exercise in bureaucratic obfuscation. You can find the transportation section here [PDF], but good luck figuring it out. With some hand-holding and a lot of consultation with people who know way more than I do, this is what I found buried in the numbers:
- The overall budget for transportation, almost $16 billion, will increase by $200 million over last year's budget
- That doesn't seem like a lot, given inflation
- Despite that increase, the proposed 2015-16 ATP allocation from state funds will decrease by 20 percent over the 2014 allocation, from $43 million to $34 million
- In addition, the proposed 2015-16 ATP allocation from federal funds will decrease by five percent over 2014, from $95 million to $90 million
There are caveats and many questions remaining. For example, the aforementioned $360 million to the ATP in the budget summary was for three years' worth of funding. The next round of ATP funding will also be for a multi-year program, but how that fits with the numbers in the current budget is not clear. It's also not clear yet whether the next round of ATP funding will be for two years or three years.
The initial round of ATP funding, allocated in May, received 770 applications that requested about $1 billion in funding. Only 265 of those projects got funded. Sure, they probably weren't all perfect applications, but likely many of them were, and 34 percent is still a small portion of projects to fund. It is clear that there is heavy demand for the Active Transportation Program funding.
Yet the proposed budget shows no commitment to expanding the ATP, and little commitment to keeping its funding at the same level, despite the climate change goals articulated in the governor's recent speeches, and despite the clear connection between increased bicycling and walking trips and reduced fuel use and emissions.
Calls to the California Transportation Commission and Caltrans have not yet produced any answers to the remaining questions. Stay tuned as we dig further.
Meanwhile the California Transportation Commission is set to approve revised guidelines for the second round of ATP funding. It held one workshop last week in Los Angeles [PDF], and the draft guidelines [PDF] will likely be approved at the commission's next meeting on January 22 in Sacramento.
Email tips, alerts, press releases, ideas, etc. to melanie@streetsblog.org.
For social media coverage focused on statewide issues, follow Melanie @currymel on Twitter or like our Facebook page here.
