Editorial: Transbay Closure Underscores Need for System Redundancy

Always have a Plan B

A shot of one of the cracked beams. Pic: Transbay Joint Powers Authority
A shot of one of the cracked beams. Pic: Transbay Joint Powers Authority

As a Streetsblog source predicted, inspectors found a second crack in the Salesforce Transit Center. The Transbay Joint Powers Authority announced that the center will be closed at least through next week while they develop a plan to shore up and repair the damage.

One report described the situation as having driven “downtown San Francisco into chaos.”

I took a Transbay bus during the height of rush hour yesterday morning. It was slow, but it went to the re-opened, ground-level Temporary Transbay Transit Center at Howard and Beale. Frankly, it didn’t seem any different from the way Transbay bus commuting has been for the past eight years. If there was chaos, it was probably more attributable to the Dreamforce conference.

But let’s imagine it’s a decade or two in the future. Electrified Caltrain trains have been running into the basement of Transbay for a year, carrying 80,000 commuters every day.

A small temblor hits at 12 a.m. It’s enough to crack a few windows and scare the bejeebers out of people, but no real damage is apparent. The Salesforce Transit Center was designed to withstand far worse. But on inspection, engineers discover more cracked beams. Transbay has to be closed again.

Reroute the buses to the old Temporary facility? It’s been converted into housing and a park and the bus slips are long gone. Divert the trains to the old Caltrain depot? No, can’t do that either. The old surface tracks were ripped out a few months ago to make way for a new development.

King Street Station. This can act as a backup if Transbay is closed again, assuming tracks aren't ripped out. Photo: Wikimedia Commons
King Street Station. This can act as a backup if Transbay is closed again, assuming tracks aren’t ripped out. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Yeah, that would be chaos.

Transit systems in cities overseas are more reliable, in large part, because they have built-in redundancies. Bomb scare at Victoria Station in London? Your commuter train is re-routed to Waterloo Station instead. Your subway’s out at Shibuya in Tokyo because of a sick passenger? Take the Yamanote surface line. Your E train is out and you can’t get to New York’s Queensboro Plaza? Take the 7 train. San Francisco has only a tiny bit of redundancy; politicos riding the J Church were able to walk to BART and still get to City Hall for Monday’s Transit Week’s kickoff ceremony. But SF transit is way too vulnerable to meltdowns. Think of BART’s debacle last year because a motorist hit a telephone pole in West Oakland.

There is no shortage of plans to move transportation infrastructure projects forward in San Francisco. But there’s no sense of urgency. And when things are built, officials seem eager to eliminate redundancies.

Let these cracks be a lesson. It’s okay to build a park on the Temporary Transbay site, but figure out a way to do it with roadways and bus bays still there, perhaps disguised as something else, with benches and park furniture that can be quickly removed. Want to get trains into the basement of Transbay? Don’t dicker around with alternate alignments, when you’ve already got one approved. And once it’s built, nobody should be talking about tearing out the existing surface tracks and station–leave them in, use them for occasional rush-hour service and maintenance trains, and keep them available for emergencies. Build above them if we must.

As the cliche goes, hope for the best, but plan for the worst. Let’s get that second Transbay tube, the bike way on the western span of the bridge, and increased ferry service online as soon as possible. Let’s build and maintain redundancy and transportation alternatives wherever possible.

Because this time the city got lucky; there was a plan ‘B’. But if we don’t start intentionally building redundancies, some day one small crack at a key location will break the whole city.

  • Andy Chow

    After BART was built, there were plans to eliminate the Transbay Terminal altogether for redevelopment (why would people take the bus if they can take BART), but we spent $2 billion on this terminal for additional capacity and redundancy for BART.

    BART was extended from Daly City to SFO with the expectation that Caltrain north of Millbrae would have reduced or no service. But we are investing more on Caltrain despite BART. At the same time BART and Caltrain provide redundancy for each other.

  • LazyReader

    Ironic the Salesforce transit center sits adjacent to the so-called sinking condominium, Millennium Tower, which has settled about 18 inches since it opened having been built over a former landfill in 2009. Transbay center is another example of space age architecture spelling doom for
    building owners. Salesforce was designed by Caeser Pelli, another
    celebrity architect known for his projects often going way over budget and
    inviting lawsuits for failed promises or structural flaws.

    Opponents of Traditional
    and Classical architecture assert such buildings are too expensive to
    construct today. Thus it’s ironic that “scientific” Modernism gave us
    this sore example not to mention has produced two of the most expensive & over-budget structures in living memory, World Trade Center 1 and the
    WTC transit Hub. Combined price tag of over 9 Billion dollars. To raise
    funds to amortize them, the Port Authority hiked tolls on its bridges
    and tunnels by 56% for four years. A startling trend in polls actually show today a
    vast majority of architecture students do not know how to draft. CAD
    (Computer aided design) has eliminated that necessity from their resume
    and as a result since they cant draft, they have little to no
    engineering know how. So the responsibility falls to engineering firms
    to make bizarre shapes and concepts, physically possible. What’s ironic
    is this abandoned Detroit Michigan transit station is more aesthetically
    appropriate for San Francisco and ironically is a century old and
    after 50 years of abandonment, neglect, exposure to the elements and
    vandalism is still standing. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/479f89ea289770aa72771b096e224cd17b546c0e42d2f577d0913a6f67ea6d9f.jpg

  • Kevin Withers

    Let’s hire Steve Heminger, soon-to-retire, and let him construct transit redundancies to cover theoretical what-if scenarios.

    He has lots of experience doing exactly that whilst at MTC.

    He can also make sure that we all stay properly taxed and obedient.

  • david vartanoff

    nah, void his pension, put him on SSI, confiscate his DL, blacklist him from taxis/uber/lyft, force him to pay regular adult single fare on public transit (no discount passes), and live in a transit deficient ‘hood.

  • SF Guest

    There are many commuters who prefer taking the bus since they would have to transfer to a local bus and pay an additional fare since buses cover many areas BART doesn’t reach. Also the chances of finding a seat on a bus are greater than on BART.

  • Hardly redundancy. The goal of BART to SFO was not to eliminate Caltrain north of Millbrae. If BART wanted Caltrain out of the picture it would keep on pushing tracks south to San Jose along the existing Caltrain ROW.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Facades, Shakeups and Loans: Transbay is Officially Off Track

|
Streetsblog readers have probably seen the stories in the Chronicle, Examiner and others that San Francisco is preparing to loan money for the completion of the Transbay Transit Center (TTC), which is now facing a $260 million construction deficit. This is all coming as the Transbay Joint Powers Authority Board of Directors reportedly decided to remove Maria Ayerdi-Kaplan, the […]

Guest Editorial: An Open Letter to Mayor Ed Lee About Transbay

|
Dear Mr. Mayor: Thanks for the world’s most expensive bus stop. Last week your administration announced a plan to connect Caltrain and California High Speed Rail to the Transbay Transit Center and remove I-280. It’s exactly the sort of bold thinking that people want from their mayor. It would “open up land for housing, connect […]