On Arguello, City Again Fails to Protect Cyclists

City installs more sub-par, watered down infrastructure, even as SFMTA votes to streamline process for building protected lanes

Cyclists turning from Anza onto Arguello contend with speeding traffic and unsafe door-death bike lanes. All photos Streetsblog/Rudick
Cyclists turning from Anza onto Arguello contend with speeding traffic and unsafe door-death bike lanes. All photos Streetsblog/Rudick

Note: Metropolitan Shuttle, a leader in bus shuttle rentals, regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog Los Angeles. Unless noted in the story, Metropolitan Shuttle is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.

Arguello Boulevard just got a fresh coat of asphalt and ‘safety upgrades.’ But, alas, no protected bike lanes–just more of the same kind of door-side designs that killed Tess Rothstein and have severely injured so many others.

Advocate Matt Brezina, who brought Arguello’s deficiencies back onto Streetsblog’s radar, also stressed that cars continue to speed on this heavily used cycling route connecting Golden Gate Park and the Presidio, making more collisions and injuries inevitable.

Cyclists left unprotected on Arguello, inviting another deadly crash
Cyclists left unprotected on Arguello, inviting another deadly crash. That’s Brezina on the right clocking speeding cars with a radar gun

The project isn’t finished and some buffers are coming, but that doesn’t change the fact that the fundamental design is old-school and flawed. “Large segments of the bike lanes on Arguello place riders in the ‘door-zone,'” said Winston Parsons, who used to lead youth rides and currently advocates for senior safety in the area. “Ensuring that painted bike lanes, the low-hanging fruit of bike infrastructure, don’t place riders directly in the path of car-doors seems like the absolute minimum design consideration. Failing at that basic principle is pretty disappointing.”

The stretch alongside Rossi Playground, which runs from Edward to Anza Street, is especially maddening. On the east side of the street at least, there aren’t any driveways (SFMTA’s knee-jerk excuse for not installing protected bike lanes). The trolley bus wire is positioned well over the motor vehicle lane, so buses aren’t an issue. There are no buildings, so no reason for a fire department ladder truck to need curb access.

Even along the park, business as usual, with a door-death bike lane
Even along the park, business as usual, with a door-death bike lane

“Staff is looking into the possibility of installing a parking-protected bikeway along Rossi Playground,” wrote Paul Stanis, Transportation Engineer for SFMTA’s Livable Streets Division, in an email reply to Streetsblog, asking why there aren’t any protected segments. He added that “Arguello Boulevard includes a high number of driveways along the project corridor with at least one for every residential building. Installing a parking-protected bike lane along Arguello would result in removing at least 90 percent (roughly 230) of all parking and loading spaces over the mile-long corridor in order to provide sufficient daylighting at driveways and cross streets.”

Perhaps SFMTA can develop a formula for how many broken bones, traumatic brain injuries, and deaths are required before we consider giving up 230 free car-storage spaces. But even that’s a red-herring. As Streetsblog has pointed out many, many times before, countries that prioritize safety have figured out how to accommodate protected bike lanes on streets with driveways and parking (here, again, is our go-to video from the Bicycle Dutch blog which shows how it’s done).

“Thanks to interest from Supervisor Sandra Fewer, we’ve been working closely with her office to identify opportunities to improve the bike lane on Arguello Boulevard. We know this is a critical park-to-park connection for Richmond District residents and beyond, which is why we’ve been advocating for bike safety improvements here since 2014,” said Kristen Leckie, community organizer at the SF Bicycle Coalition, in an email to Streetsblog. “We’re going to keep working with Fewer to keep pushing on the City to upgrade this bike lane, which carries hundreds of people a day.”

Meanwhile, at today’s SFMTA board meeting, the agency voted unanimously to streamline the process for installing protected bike lanes and to allow engineers to do safety upgrades without requiring a board vote. “Fourteen people hit and killed while walking and biking in five months,” said the SFBC’s Charles Deffarges, one of several speakers at the meeting in favor of the new process. “By fundamentally changing the approval process for life-saving street safety projects, we can streamline resources towards known high-injury corridors to prevent deaths and injuries on our streets rather than react to them.”

But, of course, that also requires SFMTA engineers to adopt world-class designs and insist they get installed on all high-injury corridors, including Arguello.

  • brezina

    So it is okay to remove street parking for car turn lanes on arguello, but not for safe protected bike lanes?

    Photo below is of Arguello southbound at Fulton. There is no parking allowed in front of these houses. Like Paul said – they all have garages anyway. Why should we put up no parking signs for car turning lanes but not for safe protected bike lanes? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/947b32671b75c8c1cd445304d9b5d86921e30346df546cc248e4fe76dda96799.jpg

  • City Resident

    Thank you Streetsblog, Brezina, and Jake Spencer for calling attention to this unsafe design and a missed opportunity by the SFMTA to improve safety. It’s too bad that they must be continually called out and cajoled to do the right thing. The current street design also slows Muni service as the 33 often must wait for the bicycle lane to clear before it can access transit stops. A well designed protected bike lane would help speed up Muni service, in addition to increasing safety for bicyclists.

  • Michael Escobar

    Northbound on Arguello I have had so many close calls with cars picking up and dropping off passengers between Fulton and Geary, especially at Rossi park. Very high speed drivers suddenly want to pull over to the curb with no signaling, or (often) they stop in the bike lane. I love how they hit their blinkers after they’ve come to a stop.

  • bike_engineer

    The reality is the the right turn lane only removes 4 or so spaces, while a protected bike lane would remove dozens and dozens of parking spaces. the residents wont allow that to happen

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

IMG_20180417_112940

Eyes on the Streets: Upper Market and Turk Finally Get their Protected Bike Lanes

|
Note: Metropolitan Shuttle, a leader in bus shuttle rentals, regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog Los Angeles. Unless noted in the story, Metropolitan Shuttle is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content. The paint was literally still drying on the inbound side of the new protected bike lane on Upper Market this morning. An SFMTA […]