Republican Gubernatorial candidates are only debating how best to delay the implementation of A.B. 32
Proponents of clean energy and environmental laws designed to reduce greenhouse gases had best not take the challenge to California's AB 32 too lightly. Backers of a ballot initiative that would "delay" implementation of the law until the state's unemployment level is below 5.5 percent for a full year look to have gathered enough signatures to put the measure to a vote this November. The coalition collecting signatures for the ballot measure is submitting its signature list for certification to state elections officials and The
Sacramento Bee quotes one of the campaign's leaders as exclaiming, "We're headed to the ballot!"
The affront to AB 32 is more than just a handful of out-of-state oil companies (like Texas-based oil firms Tesoro and Valero) and conservative activist organizations. Both major Republican candidates for Governor support some sort of delay for the legislation. In addition, the populist rhetoric fueling the campaign pitting over-reaching government against small business owners who are being strangled by over-regulation seems tailor made for a tea-party rally. Add to that the alarmist figures coming from the California Small Business Roundtable, which estimates that implementation of A.B. 32 will cost small businesses in California about $50,000 annually and would destroy more than one million California jobs and it wouldn't be surprising if more voters are swayed by the campaign.
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who's reputation as a "Green" governor rests on this legislation's implementation, released a strong statement slamming the backers of the initiative:
The effort to suspend AB 32 is the work of greedy oil companies whowant to keep polluting in our state and making profits. AB 32 will addjobs, create savings in energy costs and increase personal incomes. Infact, the highest job creation California is seeing right now is in ourgreen economy. When I ran for Governor, I said if special intereststried to push me around, I would push back. That's exactly what I willdo to these greedy oil companies.
Critics of the delay initiative also say that the proponents know that the unemployment rate is unlikely to dip to that level anytime soon and the ballot measure is just a clever way of defeating the legislation. As you can see by the chart below, the state unemployment level is almost triple that number, and hasn't been at 5.5 percent in years.
Supporters of AB 32 should also emphasize the jobs angle, but show how the greenhouse gas law improves the economy. The Bee also featured a story this weekend about one of the many green businesses that are based in California because the state's green policies guarantees a market over the next couple of years. The illustrates how fierce the competition is for these businesses between states. While California has experienced a Green Jobs boom in recent years, resulting in 159,000 new jobs, states such as Ohio are jockeying to have those jobs move out of the Golden State.
The good news is that a recent statewide poll, 58 percent of California voters still back A.B. 32. But history has shown us that those numbers can turn around in a hurry if some of the rhetoric being pushed by the naysayers catches on.
BART was the first accessible transit system in the country. Advocates want Bay Area transit agencies to do better at keeping buses and trains accessible for all